[ad_1]
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking urgent hearing on a pending PIL seeking removal of protesters at the borders of Delhi. The petition has been filed after the body of a man with one hand amputated was found a day ago at a farmers’ protest site on the Singhu border. The body of Lakhbir Singh (35), a resident of Tarn Taran in Punjab, was found tied to a police barricade near a farmers’ protest site. He had 10 wounds from sharp weapons on his body and a group of Nihangs are being held responsible for the incident.
Referring to the incident, a fresh petition has been filed seeking urgent hearing on the PIL pending since March this year. “Freedom of speech and expression cannot be above the right to life and if this protest is allowed to go on like this, the country will suffer massively,” the petition said.
Swati Goyal and Sanjeev Newar, through advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha, filed this interim application in their pending PIL. The lawyer said that after the incident of murder and mutilation of a dalit man, I have filed an application for urgent hearing before the Supreme Court. In the name of demonstrations, anti-humanitarian activities including rape of a woman and murder of a Dalit man and mutilation of dead body are taking place. It cannot be allowed to continue.
Singhu, Tikri Border News: Khattar met Home Minister Amit Shah on the issue of opening of Singhu and Tikri borders
Apart from removing the protesting farmers, the petition has also been requested by the Center to issue guidelines to the states and union territories to stop all types of demonstrations and not to allow them till the pandemic is over. The PIL said, “The demonstration which is illegal in itself cannot be allowed to continue when anti-humanitarian acts are being seen in it.” It said that the demonstrations included tractor rally on Republic Day, a Several unexpected and unacceptable incidents have been witnessed, including the rape of a woman and the murder of Lakhbir Singh on Dussehra.
It has been said in the petition that at a time when there is a ban on celebrating festivals, visiting temples, going to schools and colleges, then it would not be good to allow such demonstrations. It said, “The protesters are putting their lives at risk not only but millions of people of India and such a long movement cannot be allowed especially when the pandemic is going on.” Prolonged protest in public places is not only a clear violation of the Supreme Court orders but it is also violating the right to life of others who are directly or indirectly affected by these protests.
Farmers Protest: Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait cried in front of the media, said- I will commit suicide
The petition said that the PIL was first listed for hearing on May 10, but the hearing could not take place on that day due to a fault in one of the Supreme Court servers and could not be heard even later. Meanwhile, the apex court is also hearing a petition by Noida resident Monika Agarwal. The petitioner, requesting removal of the blockades, said that earlier they used to take 20 minutes to reach Delhi and now it is taking more than two hours and the people of the area are facing difficulties due to the demonstrations at the UP Gate on the Delhi border. Is.
On October 4, the top court had sought answers from 43 farmers’ unions and their leaders, including Rakesh Tikait, Darshan Pal and Gurnam Singh, who were leading the protests on the borders of Delhi. The court had sought answers from the Haryana government on a plea alleging that farmer leaders were not in talks with its committee to resolve the impasse over road blockade here.
[ad_2]
Source link